|
Given the size and weight of today's massive commercial
vehicles, accidents involving the trucking industry
can be especially damaging, and the resulting lawsuits
often involve multiple plaintiffs and defendants. Over
the years, Golomb & Honik has achieved favorable results
in the most challenging trucking accidents. You can
read about some of these successes below:
- After a husband and wife pulled their
minivan onto the shoulder of the road to look at a
map, they were struck by a speeding tractor trailer.
Both were hospitalized with severe injuries, and she
was permanently confined to a wheelchair in a condition
requiring extensive care. Golomb & Honik attorneys
were part of a team that established that the truck
driver had been speeding, that he had exceeded the
permissible number of hours on the road, and that
much of the proper documentation for the truck had
not been filed. In addition, they established that
the trucking company knew about these many deficiencies.
On the third day of trial, a confidential eight-figure
settlement was reached.
- Driving home
one day, a man braked to a stop when he came across
an accident being cleared on the interstate. Before
he could begin moving again, he was rear-ended by
a tractor-trailer going more than 45 miles per hour.
His vehicle was thrown into the air and traveled more
than 20 feet. Golomb & Honik attorneys established
that the truck driver had looked down for a period,
leading to the accident. After complex negotiations
due to insurance coverage issues and the participation
of multiple parties, the case was settled for $1 million.
-
A long- distance truck driver regularly made stops
between New Jersey to Florida. While delivering supplies
in South Carolina, he began to open the trailer doors.
The doors flew open, and hundreds of pounds of frozen
foods landed on him, causing serious bodily injuries,
including two comminuted fractures; the injuries required
multiple surgeries and a lengthy hospital say in South
Carolina. Suit was instituted against the trucking
company that contracted the driver for this trip;
it turned out that the produce had been loaded improperly,
causing it to shift. When he opened the door, the
load came down on him. Liability was vigorously disputed.
The defendant employees blamed the driver, testifying
that he was late due to mechanical problems earlier
that day and "rushed" to get out of the depot. This
defense theory was rebutted by records subpoenaed
from the defendant trucking company, the local cellular
phone service company, and a nearby convenience store
where he had also made deliveries. After two days
of trial, the case settled for a confidential amount
in the high six figures. The settlement also included
a separate amount and an actual account set up for
the sole purpose of paying for future medical expenses.
|